Cele mai bune recenzii Avocați

Recenzii: The subject under investigation, for this complaint for his offenses is one Brian Dumas, with contact information as follows:
• Brian O. Dumas; 2216 Bee Ridge Road; Columbia, SC 29223;
DOB = 1/2/56; (803)-736-2058; bulldogbandit@sc....

Continuă ›

Recenzii: The subject under investigation, for this complaint for his offenses is one Brian Dumas, with contact information as follows:
• Brian O. Dumas; 2216 Bee Ridge Road; Columbia, SC 29223;
DOB = 1/2/56; (803)-736-2058; bulldogbandit@sc.rr.com

Among the many offenses and crimes that Brian Dumas has committed against his victims, clients, and our rule of law, as an oxymoronical practicing attorney is the following

• Brian Dumas has been convicted of three driving under the influence offenses.
• Brian Dumas’ has lost his driver’s license, driving privileges, and ability to drive.
• Brian Dumas has possessed and used controlled substances with other attorneys.
• Brian Dumas has possessed and used cocaine with other attorneys.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty in violating South Carolina Supreme Court Rule 32 Code of Professional Responsibility.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of committing conduct of dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation DR 1-102(A).
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of entering business transactions with clients without client consent after full disclosure DR 5-104(A).
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of neglecting legal matters entrusted to him DR-101(A)(3).
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of intentionally failing to carry out a contract with a client for professional services.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of intentionally prejudicing and damaging his client during the course of their professional relationship DR 9-102(A).
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of not depositing his clients’ funds in identifiable bank accounts DR 9-102(A).
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of not maintaining complete records of all funds and properties of his clients and rendering appropriate accounts to his clients DR 9-102(B).
• The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas did not meet the ethical standards for which he is bound as an attorney, by which he is not eligible to be an attorney, and must be disbarred.
• The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas ruled that Brian Dumas injured his clients.
• The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that Brian Dumas adversely reflects upon attorneys who strict to discharge their duties honestly.
• The South Carolina Supreme Court ordered Brian Dumas to pay restitution to his victims in full, complying with DR 9-102(B).
• South Carolina Attorney General Travis Medlock along with Assistant Attorneys General James Bogle and Emory Smith prosecuted Brian Dumas for Plaintiffs Tana Hutto, James Duoucette, Bambi Jo Flynt, John Preacher, James Daniels, Aubrey Gilmore, Elizabeth Pilot, and the State of South Carolina.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of committing acts of misconduct towards several clients by the South Carolina Supreme Court.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty of engaging in activities to bring the legal profession into disrepute by the South Carolina Supreme Court.
• Brian Dumas was found guilty and disbarred before a Panel of the Board of Commissioners of Grievances and Discipline following six days of testimony.
• The Executive Committee of the Board adopted the Panel’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and also determined Brian Dumas to be disbarred.

These actions are shown in Volume 309 Report Series 5 of South Carolina Supreme Court 309 S.C. 5 and Volume 419 Second Edition Report Series 791 of South Carolina Supreme Court 419 S.E.2d 791. This is cited in Exhibit A.

The Committee on Character and Fitness of the South Carolina Supreme Court denied Brian Dumas petition for reinstatement in Volume 360 Report Series 33 of South Carolina Supreme Court 360 S.C. 33 and Volume 600 Second Edition Report Series 61 of South Carolina Supreme Court 600 S.E.2d 61. This is cited in Exhibit B.

More of Brian Dumas victims are Seth G. Niles, Raymond Bovain Jr, Willor Dean Bovain, and Tara Cook. In these actions, Brian Dumas publishes default judgments against Seth Giles in the Columbia Star. Brian Dumas worked to deny insurance benefits for the surviving husband Raymond Bovain Jr of his deceased wife Willor Dean Bovain who was killed from a collision with a truck on I-26, whose car was struck from behind, burst into flames, and died at the scene. Brian Dumas filed a foreclosure against the property owned by Tara Cook in the Columbia Star. These are cited in Exhibit C.

Please find exerts from the South Carolina Supreme Court’s conduct for which sanctions were imposed on attorneys for disbarment of Brian Dumas in Exhibit D. In it, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, found Brian Dumas to be unfit to be a member of the South Carolina Bar any longer, in committing numerous violations in the administration of justice. The South Carolina Judicial Department Annual Report containing Brian Dumas’ sanctions, disbarment, and full content from Exhibit D, may be found in its entirety in Exhibit E.

Please find Brian Dumas’ talks on substance abuse and drug addiction in Exhibit F. Brian Dumas speaks as an Expert in the field of substance abuse and drug addiction of attorneys in South Carolina. Brian Dumas speaks about substance abuse of cocaine, crack, stimulants, opiods, marijuana, hash, and sedatives. Brian Dumas speaks about weekly use of stimulants, sedatives, marijuana, and opioids. Brian Dumas speaks about using opioids, sedatives, and stimulants without a prescription. Brian Dumas discusses the impact of substance abuse and drug addiction on lawyers. The South Carolina Supreme Court Commission on Continuing Legal Education Course Number 190747 may be found in its entirety in Exhibit G.

Brian Dumas issued subpoenas unlawfully to my medical providers in violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, 42CFR part 2, and Healthcare Privacy Laws. In addition, Mr. Dumas lied to the court by stating he had given the subpoena to my attorney, which he had not, which is required by law. Brian Dumas had not even sent the subpoenas he issued to my own attorney. No one knew Brian Dumas was going around collecting all my medical records. This evidence of Brian Dumas lying about the subpoenas, which he did not issue to my attorney, and also in direct violation of healthcare laws is attached. This is shown in Exhibit H.

Brian Dumas ordered my false arrest, my false imprisonment, and made other false accusations against myself and my family, merely for requesting my children’s report cards, attendance records, educational information, and other records regarding my children which I have every right to request of my children under law. Brian Dumas acted against the rule of law and violated Federal, State, County, and Court Orders disobeying all of them to harm and injure myself and my family members.

• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated South Carolina Code of Laws §63-5-30 Rights and Duties of Parents Regarding Minor Children.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated United States Code of Laws 20 U.S.C. §1232g Family Educational and Privacy Rights Act FERPA.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated Subpoena Order dated 2/8/2019, State of South Carolina, Fifth Judicial Circuit, County of Richland.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated Court Order dated 4/4/2019, State of South Carolina, Fifth Judicial Circuit, County of Richland.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated United States Code of Laws 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act FOIA.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated United States Code of Laws 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act ADA.
• Brian Dumas purposefully and deliberately violated South Carolina Code of Laws §16-17-722 Filing of False Police Reports, Knowledge, Offense, and Penalties.
• Brian Dumas has defrauded the taxpayers of Kershaw County and the State of South Carolina in using taxpayers’ money to attack Father as an instrument of Brian Dumas’ own personal hate and vendetta, having absolutely nothing to do with law, regulation, or rules: only revenge.
• Brian Dumas has defrauded the government employees of Kershaw County by using them at his disposal to attack Father as an instrument of Brian Dumas’ own personal hate and vendetta, having absolutely nothing to do with law, regulation, or rules: only revenge.

These actions and more are shown in Exhibit I. Brian Dumas’s arrest warrant with full content and supporting information from Exhibit I may be found in its entirety in Exhibit J.

Brian Dumas hired Bloodhound Investigation Services to invade my family's home, batter and assault me, destroy our property and home, trespass on our property, break and enter into our family's residence, illegally record us on our property, and falsely report crimes we did not commit against us. Brian Dumas ordered

Mai puțin ›

Recenzii: The Bostic Law Firm and Christopher Michael Ramsey, Bar No. 75323, DOB = 2/23/81; 3130 Floral Bank Lane, Charleston, SC 29414; 864-992-9484; cr258@aol.com; have committed lawyer misconduct. Chris Ramsey has violated the Rules of Professional Cond...

Continuă ›

Recenzii: The Bostic Law Firm and Christopher Michael Ramsey, Bar No. 75323, DOB = 2/23/81; 3130 Floral Bank Lane, Charleston, SC 29414; 864-992-9484; cr258@aol.com; have committed lawyer misconduct. Chris Ramsey has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, adopted by the Supreme Court of South Carolina by his unethical behavior, his immoral values, and his criminal actions. Chris Ramsey must be disbarred from the practice of law in South Carolina for said violations for the safety and protection of its citizens and law abiding residents. I am hereby charging Chris Ramsey with financial exploitation, abuse of a handicapped person, along with psychological, emotional, and mental cruelty.

I have had the unfortunate experience of hiring Chris Ramsey as my attorney over two months ago, during which time Chris Ramsey did absolutely nothing on my case, submitted no information, documents, or requested complaints or filings, and did everything in his power to harm and injure his client me. Chris Ramsey promised me that he would submit a complaint which I had already drafted for him to use as a draft: Chris Ramsey lied and never did this. Chris Ramsey promised to submit numerous critical documents of my case, related to the opposing party, their false claims, and the harm and injuries caused by the opposing party against myself and my family: Chris Ramsey lied and never submitted a single thing. The only thing that Chris Ramsey did was to collude and conspire with the opposing party and parties who are not even parties to this lawsuit and litigation in order to harm myself and my family. Chris Ramsey never gave me a legal agreement or signed contract, whereby he had already agreed to represent me after paying him a substantial retainer. Perhaps Chris Ramsey’s excuse is that “he never represented me” because he refused to sign an executed agreement after accepting payment and obviously causing harm and injury to myself and my family on my court case.

The only thing that Chris Ramsey did do was demand that I produce a letter of good health from my healthcare provider after two months of “non-service” and “non-performance” on the job. Chris Ramsey collude and conspired with Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, and Dan Boles to demand this from me. The only thing Chris Ramsey did was submit this letter of good health to the court. Immediately upon its submission, within hours, Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey had plotted, threatened, forced, and compelled said healthcare worker. These threats and demands were made where I lived in Arizona, while these parties feigned legal authority, falsely practiced law in the State of Arizona, and wrote absolutely “fake” subpoenas demanding this information from my healthcare worker. My healthcare provider was scared, threatened, and felt they had to give Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey whatever they demanded. The truth was my healthcare provider didn’t have to give Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey anything; none of them are lawyers, passing the state bar in Arizona, none of them of legal authority in Arizona, and none of them are qualified to issue subpoenas or any other legal demands, or to state they are attorneys in Arizona.

Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey all of them knew better than this. Yet their greed for money. Their hatred of myself and my family, drove them to commit not only these numerous violations of Rule 407 and Rule 413 in their lawyer misconduct and disciplinary actions. Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey also committed criminal actions in their conduct and behavior, knowing all to well what they were doing. Even more than that Brian Dumas, Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey submitted false documents to my healthcare provider; and they plotted and submitted false documents to the court of law in South Carolina. All to satisfy their greed and hatred.

It should be known that twice in 1991 and 2004, Brian Dumas has been disbarred by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, the Committee on Character and Fitness, and the South Carolina Supreme Court for numerous violations of Rule 407 and Rule 413. In fact this entire scheme was concocted and orchestrated by Brian Dumas himself leading the effort. Brian Dumas has already been made, not once, but twice, ordered not to represent any client in South Carolina and anywhere else as an attorney because of the numerous crimes he has committed against his own clients and the opposing parties. Brian Dumas should not be allowed to rope other attorneys into continually committing crimes again and again. Enough is enough for Brian Dumas law career to be ended forever. Drew Raedeker, Dan Boles, and Chris Ramsey should join Brian Dumas with stern disciplinary actions revoking their licenses such that they never think about violatiions of Rule 407 and Rule 413 again and prey to live within the bounds set by the Committee on Character and Fitness which they are flaunting.

The Bostic Law Firm and Christopher Michael Ramsey, Bar No. 75323, DOB = 2/23/81; 3130 Floral Bank Lane, Charleston, SC 29414; 864-992-9484; cr258@aol.com; have committed lawyer misconduct. Chris Ramsey has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, adopted by the Supreme Court of South Carolina by his unethical behavior, his immoral values, and his criminal actions. Chris Ramsey must be disbarred from the practice of law in South Carolina for said violations for the safety and protection of its citizens and law abiding residents. I am hereby charging Chris Ramsey with financial exploitation, abuse of a handicapped person, along with psychological, emotional, and mental cruelty.

Mai puțin ›

Recenzii: Harrison, Radeker, & Smith have stolen over $327,770.00 from myself and my family and refused to return it

• Andrew Sims Radeker; 6511 Dare Circle; Columbia, SC 29206-1152;
DOB = 05/14/78; SC Bar # 73743; (803) 779-2211;...

Continuă ›

Recenzii: Harrison, Radeker, & Smith have stolen over $327,770.00 from myself and my family and refused to return it

• Andrew Sims Radeker; 6511 Dare Circle; Columbia, SC 29206-1152;
DOB = 05/14/78; SC Bar # 73743; (803) 779-2211; adriane.radeker@gmail.com

Harrison, Radeker, and Smith are making numerous false statements regarding myself, my children, and my family. I have repeatedly asked Harrison, Radeker, and Smith to stop making false statements which are causing harm and injury to myself, my children, and my family but they refuse to do so.

Please refund $327,770.00 that Harrison, Radeker, and Smith have stolen from myself and my family that they have refused to return to me.

Never do business with Harrison, Radeker, and Smith. They will steal your money and never speak to you again.

Mai puțin ›

Recenzii: Not I would not recommend her paid her thousands of dollars to represent me in court and did nothing with my case froze it and had me waiting a year for court once we went to court she had no plan at all. Didn't do an investigation all the ev...

Continuă ›

Recenzii: Not I would not recommend her paid her thousands of dollars to represent me in court and did nothing with my case froze it and had me waiting a year for court once we went to court she had no plan at all. Didn't do an investigation all the evidence I got on my own and she did nothing. Didn't use witnesses or a signed affidavit from the key witness. The witnesses were corrupted and not credible and had information to prove it through cross examination and did not. All she did was refute and a case brief and that was not why I hired her. Didn't even try to prove the intent in court. Before court kept saying she could win on appeal but if she could win on appeal couldn't she win in court? She was also on the Super Lawyer list which has to be fraudulent because her legal skills belong in a city dump. Was never truthful about anything would never answer calls would go straight to fax. Told me she filed a motion to jave my case dismissed for violating the 45 day rule then found out through the transcript she wavered my right. She lost a case to where there was no evidence only testimony and the investigator admitted in court he didn't do an investigation only took everyone's word. Once it was official that my case was lost she tried to get over two thousand more dollars on appeal. I tuned that notion out and hired an attorney competent and professional to represent me. This review is factual nothing held back. I'm also an Army veteran and still serve this country if you want to be represented with proper counsel this attorney is not the one that will provide it. Make sure the proper research is done in selecting an attorney or you will regret hiring one that is incompetent and unprofessional.

Mai puțin ›

Recenzii: I told my attorney, Joshua Bentley, that my now ex-wife had made filings for a divorce. He then asked me what Department my case was in.

Mr. Bentley then told me [in person] to text him for a referral to a family law attorney. I ha...

Continuă ›

Recenzii: I told my attorney, Joshua Bentley, that my now ex-wife had made filings for a divorce. He then asked me what Department my case was in.

Mr. Bentley then told me [in person] to text him for a referral to a family law attorney. I had to contact him several times over the next week and half to get that referral.

When he finally got back to me, he referred me to Ms. Amini, who I then hired.

Ms. Amini told me that she could not represent me if I did not hire a therapist to prepare me for my divorce. She then referred me to Valerie Houghton.

I was emailed instructions to pay Ms. Houghton only in cash and not to tell anyone. Furthermore, Ms. Houghton stated several times to me that the judge [Honorable James E. Towery] would be angry should I fire either her or Ms. Amini.

I asked Ms. Amini several times about needs for secrecy and cash payments. She never gave me an answer that made any sense.

After paying about $30,000 between the two of them in a span of two months, I fired both of them.

The next hearing Judge Towery vacated all of my hearings without my consent. These hearings included ones pertaining to custody and visitation.

Judge Towery also consistently ruled against me and violated many Rules of Court to my detriment throughout the remaining proceedings.

After the end of my divorce I carefully examined Ms. Houghton's website. She listed the Honorable Towery as a former employer and as a reference.

Furthermore, Ms. Houghton had offered her services to my ex-wife after I fired her.

It has been almost four years since I have last had contact with my children. There is nothing in the record that would indicate that it should be so. In fact, the police report which is the basis for no contact [that I subpoenaed] has been removed from the record against my objections.

I informed Judge Towery of my intent to complain. The next day the record was uploaded into digital format. Many of my pleadings [1/3 of the record] are now missing.

Ms. Houghton's website has also been removed from the internet [www.valeriehoughton.com].

Despite the Honorable Towery's obvious conflict of interest, he has refused to recuse himself. In fact, he has ordered that I not have contact with any of my four children for an additional 5 years. There is a pending complaint against him regarding this matter filed with the Commission on Judicial Performance.

There also also pending complaints against Ms. Amini and Ms. Houghton with the State Bar of California.

I have also filed a Civil Rights case against the Honorable Towery.

Here is the link:

www.scribd.com/document/383591530/Judge-James-E-Towery-Complaint-Superior-Court-of-California-County-of-Santa-Clara

Mai puțin ›